I would like to see Mastodon thrive. But the platform’s ideological
zealotry is obviously holding it back and seemingly isn’t going to
change.
Daring Fireball: WHY HAS MASTODON ADOPTION STALLED?
Holding it back from what, exactly? Do we think that the reason you
start up a Mastodon instance is to become the next Twitter?
(And as an aside, I'm not sure what Daring Fireball re-titled the
original article from "Why did the #TwitterMigration fail?" to "Why
has Mastodon adoption stalled?" which I think undersells what a
lunatic Bloonface seems to be.)
Darius Kazemi has a document on why you should run your own social
network, and in it he sets the goal of having a maximum of 50 users.
The main reason to run a small social network site is that you can
create an online environment tailored to the needs of your community
in a way that a big corporation like Facebook or Twitter never
could. Yes, you can always start a Facebook Group for your community
and moderate that how you like, but only within certain bounds set by
Facebook. If you (or your community) run the whole site, then you are
ultimately the boss of what goes on. It is harder work than letting
Facebook or Twitter or Slack or Basecamp or whoever else take care of
everything, but I believe it's worth it.
What does thriving mean if your goal is to nurture your community?